Evidence Hub

Cerebral air embolism after implantation of a leadless pacemaker via the right internal jugular vein: a case report

Ollitrault P, Al Khoury M, Champ-Rigot L, Font J, Pellissier A

European heart journal. Case reports, 2026

Abstract

Background: Leadless pacemaker (LP) implantation is associated with fewer device-related complications than conventional transvenous pacing systems. While traditionally performed via the femoral vein, the right internal jugular (RIJ) approach has recently emerged as an alternative strategy, potentially improving catheter control. However, safety data for this approach remain limited.

Case summary: A 77-year-old man with precapillary pulmonary hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and recurrent traumatic syncope underwent LP implantation via the RIJ vein following documentation of infra-Hissian conduction delay (HV interval 80 ms). The procedure was uneventful, with satisfactory electrical parameters. Immediately after repositioning the patient in a 30° head-up position, he developed acute neurological deterioration (Glasgow Coma Scale 6/15). Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) excluded pericardial effusion but revealed air bubbles in the right ventricle. Cerebral computed tomography demonstrated multiple air bubbles within the right intracerebral venous system, consistent with retrograde cerebral venous air embolism. Emergency management included Trendelenburg positioning, 100% oxygen administration, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Neurological status improved, although a persistent left-sided motor deficit remained. At 15-month follow-up, no further syncope occurred, and the LP functioned normally, but residual left limbs hypokinesia persisted.

Discussion: This case illustrates…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free