Evidence Hub

Conservative management of iatrogenic pulmonary vein obstruction following transcatheter sinus venosus ASD repair: a case insight and literature review

Khajali Z, Kian N, Firouzi A, Pouraliakbar H, Salari S

BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026

Abstract

Background: Iatrogenic pulmonary vein obstruction (PVO) is a rare but serious complication that may occur following transcatheter correction of sinus venosus atrial septal defect (SVASD) with partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection (PAPVC) using covered stents. This procedure has gained increasing acceptance in recent years. The optimal management strategy, particularly the role of conservative therapy, remains poorly defined. A 42-year-old man with a 1.5 × 1.0 cm superior vena cava (SVC)-type SVASD, PAPVC, and severe pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) underwent transcatheter repair after six months of targeted vasodilator therapy. Under fluoroscopic and transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) guidance, a 57 mm long Optimus-CVS PTFE-covered XXL stent (AndraTec, Germany) was deployed, internally telescoped with a 45 mm long bare-metal CP stent (NuMED, USA) for cranial anchoring. Intra-procedural TEE showed correct stent position and unobstructed pulmonary venous flow. However, 24 h later, the patient developed acute hypoxemia. Computed tomography angiography revealed complete occlusion of the anterior segment of the right upper pulmonary vein with associated thrombosis. Because the patient remained hemodynamically stable, conservative management was initiated with corticosteroids, diuretics, and therapeutic anticoagulation (apixaban plus aspirin). Within five days, oxygen saturation normalized to 90% on room air, and chest imaging confirmed resolution of pulmonary…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free