Evidence Hub

Three Strikingly Different Crystal Habits of Tadalafil: Design, Characterization, Pharmaceutical Performance, and Computational Studies

Nagesh A. Bhale, Saurabh Shah, Avvaru Subha Jahnavi, Arti Vishwakarma, Tejender S. Thakur, Sajesh P. Thomas, Saurabh Srivastava, Amol G. Dikundwar

Molecular Pharmaceutics, 2024

12 citations

Abstract

The present study aims at improving the physicochemical properties of a widely used drug Tadalafil through crystal habit modification, without changing the polymorphic form. Three distinct types of crystal habits, namely, needle, plate, and block, were obtained under controlled crystallization protocols with optimized solvent compositions. Complete characterization of these three crystal habits was carried out using powder X-ray diffraction, differential scanning calorimetry, thermogravimetric analysis, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Morphological features were studied by optical and scanning electron microscopy. Evaluation of the pharmaceutical performance of different crystal habits reveals significant improvement in compressibility and flow properties for the block-shaped crystals in comparison to the needle- and plate-shaped crystals. Also, a more linear tablet compression behavior was noted for the plate and block morphologies of the API compared to their needle counterpart. In vitro dissolution studies showed distinct release profiles for the same API form with different crystal habits, i.e., needle > plate > block. Insights into crystal growth mechanism and the role of solvents in affording the observed crystal habits are presented based on molecular dynamics simulations of intermolecular interactions with crystal facets, in conjunction with the experimental crystal face indexing of the single crystals of different habits. These observations were further…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a simulation / modelling, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free