Evidence Hub

The effect of exercise training on clinical outcomes in patients with the metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ostman C, Smart NA, Morcos D, Duller A, Ridley W, Jewiss D

Cardiovascular diabetology, 2017

173 citations

Abstract

Background: Purpose: to establish if exercise training improves clinical outcomes in people with metabolic syndrome (MetS). Registered with PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/Identifier:CRD42017055491 ).

Data sources: studies were identified through a MEDLINE search strategy (1985 to Jan 12, 2017), Cochrane controlled trials registry, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus.

Study selection: prospective randomized or controlled trials of exercise training in humans with metabolic syndrome, lasting 12 weeks or more.

Results: We included 16 studies with 23 intervention groups; 77,000 patient-hours of exercise training. In analyses of aerobic exercise studies versus control: body mass index was significantly reduced, mean difference (MD) -0.29 (kg m-2) (95% CI -0.44, -0.15, p 2 was significantly improved MD 3.00 mL kg-1 min-1 (95% CI 1.92, 4.08, p -1 (95% CI -0.32, -0.01, p = 0.04); triglycerides were significantly reduced MD -0.21 mmol L-1 (95% CI -0.29, -0.13, p -1 (95% CI -0.05, -0.00, p = 0.02). In analyses of combined exercise versus control: waist circumference, MD -3.80 cm (95% CI -5.65, -1.95, p 2 MD 4.64 mL kg-1 min-1 (95% CI 2.42, 6.87, p < 0.0001); systolic blood pressure MD -3.79 mmHg (95% CI -6.18, -1.40, p = 0.002); and high density lipoprotein (HDL) MD 0.14 (95% CI 0.04, 0.25, p = 0.009) were all significantly improved. We found no significant differences between outcome measures between the two exercise…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free