Evidence Hub

From Growth Factors to an Immune-Centric Approach: A Systematic Review of the Biological and Clinical Evidence for Platelet-Rich Plasma in Erectile Dysfunction

Laura Rehak, Giada Maria Manti, Giuseppe Sangiorgi

Biologics, 2026

Abstract

Background: Intracavernosal platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is increasingly used for erectile dysfunction (ED), despite the absence of standardized biological characterization and clear dose definitions. This systematic review evaluates the clinical efficacy of PRP in ED while integrating emerging immune-centric mechanistic evidence. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective studies (2020–2025) investigating intracavernosal PRP in adult men with ED were identified across major databases. Validated outcomes included International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF or IIEF-5), Erection Hardness Score (EHS), Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP), and penile Doppler parameters. Preclinical data were narratively integrated to contextualize biological plausibility. Results: Fourteen clinical studies met the inclusion criteria (six RCTs, eight prospective cohorts). Across most studies, PRP produced clinically relevant within-patient improvements, and three RCTs demonstrated minimal clinically important difference (MCID) responder rates compared with placebo. However, other trials showed comparable improvements in placebo arms, underscoring substantial contextual effects. Safety was consistently favourable. Marked heterogeneity in blood volume processed (10–120 mL), injected PRP volume (3–12 mL), preparation systems, and session protocols precluded cross-study comparability. Critically, no study reported platelet dose, leukocyte subsets,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free