Evidence Hub

What are the risk factors for erectile dysfunction following penile fracture surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Harith Naufal Subrata, Syah Mirsya Warli

Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia, 2025

527 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Penile fracture is one of the rare urological emergencies resulting in rupture of the tunica albuginea in the penile corpora cavernosa. Sexual intercourse is known to be the most common aetiology of penile fracture, which usually happens during erection. Immediate surgical intervention is crucial to avoid any complications. Erectile dysfunction is the most feared complication after surgery. This meta-analysis aimed to analyse and determine risk factors of erectile dysfunction among patients who underwent penile fracture surgery. METHODS: Literature searching was conducted in several databases, e.g., Pubmed, Cochrane, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar and DOAJ by applying the Boolean term method. Statistical analyses and risk of bias assessment were calculated through RevMan 5.4.1 and the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS), respectively. Outcomes were presented as odds ratio (OR). RESULTS: A total of 6 studies were included, encompassing 527 patients who were diagnosed with penile fracture and underwent surgery for repairment. Risk factors for post-surgery erectile dysfunction were calculated. Age (OR = 0.19, 95% CI [0.07, 0.52], p=0.001), location of fracture (OR = 0.43, 95% CI [0.22, 0.84], p=0.01), and side of fracture (OR = 0.06, 95% CI [0.02, 0.21], p<0.0001) have significant relations with erectile dysfunction. Whereas aetiology, urethral injury, and timing of presentation have statistically non significant effect on the incidence of erectile dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 527 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free