Evidence Hub

Animal Models of Steroid-Induced Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head Established by Different Doses of Lipopolysaccharide Combined with Glucocorticoids: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Wenlong Luo, Yuchen Duan, Hui Huang, X J Li, Yi Zhou, Yimei Hu

International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2026

Abstract

Steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head (SONFH) is commonly modeled using lipopolysaccharide (LPS) combined with glucocorticoids, but the comparative performance of different LPS doses remains unclear. We conducted a network meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines and registration in PROSPERO (CRD420261346269) to compare different LPS dose regimens combined with glucocorticoids for establishing SONFH animal models. Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched through December 2025 for randomized controlled animal studies. The primary outcome was the empty osteocyte lacunae rate, and the secondary outcome was the modeling success rate. Forty articles comprising 49 studies and 923 animals were included. Compared with normal controls, low-, medium-, and high-dose LPS combined with glucocorticoids all significantly increased the empty osteocyte lacunae rate and modeling success rate. High-dose LPS produced a significantly greater empty lacunae rate than low-dose LPS, whereas most other pairwise comparisons were not statistically significant. Subgroup analyses indicated that modeling efficacy was influenced by animal species, glucocorticoid dose, and modeling duration, while high-dose LPS may be associated with increased mortality risk. Overall, LPS plus glucocorticoids effectively induces SONFH-like pathological changes, but protocol selection should balance modeling efficacy and safety, and no single definitively optimal regimen can yet be concluded.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free