Evidence Hub

ZINCPharmer-Based Identification of Multi-Target Inhibitors for Erectile Dysfunction: Pharmacophore Virtual Screening and Molecular Docking of Commercially Available Compounds

Ibrahim Adeola Moronfolu, Abiodun Musliudeen Ibrahim

Research Square, 2026

300 participants

Abstract

Abstract Erectile dysfunction (ED) affects approximately 300 million men globally, with current phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors associated with cardiovascular complications, headache, and addiction potential. This study employed ZINCPharmer pharmacophore-based virtual screening to identify novel multi-target inhibitors from commercially available compounds addressing multiple ED pathophysiological pathways. Using established PDE-5 inhibitors as query templates, four hit compounds were evaluated through molecular docking against PDE-5, arginase, protein kinase C (PKC), and O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT). Compound 4 demonstrated superior multi-target binding performance with strongest PDE-5 affinity (-9.11 kcal/mol versus − 8.96 kcal/mol for sildenafil), exceptional O-GlcNAc transferase binding energy (-45.41 kcal/mol, surpassing sildenafil at -31.00 kcal/mol), and favorable PKC binding (-52.13 kcal/mol), indicating robust polypharmacological potential. Notably, its higher LD 50 value (1000 mg/kg) suggests wider therapeutic window compared to Compound 1 (380 mg/kg), despite two Lipinski violations and low gastrointestinal absorption requiring optimization. Compound 1 exhibited remarkably favorable arginase binding energy (-3.63 kcal/mol), zero Lipinski violations, high gastrointestinal absorption, non-blood-brain barrier permeability, and minimal CYP 450 inhibition. Toxicological predictions indicated hepatotoxicity for Compound 4 and nephrotoxicity for Compound 1, though…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 300 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free