Evidence Hub

COVID-19-Associated Cognitive Biases on Pneumonia Differential Diagnosis

Cruz P, Meireles AM, Santos M, Rodrigues MR

Cureus, 2024

1 citation

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic favors cognitive biases such as anchoring and availability biases. The first refers to overvaluing some of the initial information and establishing a diagnosis too early, with resistance to future adjustments. The latter happens when diagnoses more frequently considered are regarded as more common in reality. This case, in which the correct diagnosis was delayed due to these biases, highlights the need to remain aware of them as a means toward timely diagnosis and therapeutic success of pneumonia cases. An 84-year-old woman presented with a mild non-productive cough for two months and fever. She had a history of breast carcinoma treated with radiotherapy in the previous year. Computerized tomography (CT) showed extensive bilateral consolidation foci with ground-glass-opacification areas and bilateral pleural effusion, CO-RADS 3. COVID-19 with bacterial superinfection was suspected and levofloxacin was initiated. Nasopharyngeal swab polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out three times, always negative for SARS-CoV-2. As the patient remained with fever and cough, the antibiotic was escalated to piperacillin/tazobactam and then to meropenem/vancomycin. She underwent bronchofibroscopy and alveolar lavage, with negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR. The re-evaluation CT scan maintained bilateral consolidations, with an aerial bronchogram. The biopsy of pulmonary consolidation allowed the diagnosis of radiation-induced organizing…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free