Evidence Hub

Incidence and resistance patterns of pathogens from lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI)

Dorobăţ OM, Moisoiu A, Tălăpan D

Pneumologia (Bucharest, Romania), 2007

Abstract

The aim of present study was to evaluate the incidence and antibiotic susceptibility of pathogens in LRTI for patients in ICU/Surgery and pneumological wards from Marius Nasta Institute. A number of 938 strains isolated between September 1st 2004 and September 1st 2005 were identified by standard procedures and antimicrobial resistance was determined following CLSI approved standard. Imipenem-EDTA Double Disk Synergy test and Etest were used for detection of metallo-beta-lactamase producing isolates of P.aeruginosa. There were isolated 744 Gram-negative strains: H. influenzae 34.6%, P. aeruginosa 17.7%, H. parainfluenzae 15.9%, K. pneumoniae 8.6% and another spp. and 194 Gram-positive strains: 54.1% S.aureus and 45.9% S.pneumoniae. Among H. influenzae and H. parainfluenzae isolates, the highest resistance rate was to trimethoprim/sulfametoxazole (SXT 30.9% and 31.1%), followed by ampicillin (AMP 11.6% and 13.4%), chloramphenicol (C 4.5% and 5.1%) and clarithromycin (1.6% and 13.6%). P. aeruginosa strains showed a resistance rate between 7.9% to amikacin and 38.3% to cefoperazone. The resistance to imipenem (IPM) and meropenem (MEM) was close: 28.2% and 26.0%. From 36 P. aeruginosa IPM and multidrug resistant strains tested, 8 were probably producing metallo-beta-lactamase. For S. aureus the highest resistance rate was to penicillin 93.3% followed by erythromycin (E 45.7%), oxacillin 41.9% and CIP (33.3%); all strains were susceptible to vancomycin, teicoplanin and linezolid.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free