Evidence Hub

Antimicrobial resistance in respiratory pathogens isolated in Brazil during 1999-2000

Critchley IA, Blosser RS, Karlowsky JA, Yamakita J, Barth A, Sader HS, Mendes C, Teixeira L et al.

The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases, 2001

Abstract

The in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of the respiratory pathogens Streptococcus Pneumoniae, Hemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis to commonly tested and prescribed agents was investigated during 1999-2000 and compared with results obtained during a previous 1997-1998 study. Of 448 isolates of S. Pneumoniae collected and tested in 1999-2000, 77.2% were susceptible, 19.9% were intermediate, and 2.9% were resistant to penicillin, demonstrating that there were no major changes in susceptibility to penicillin from 1997-1998 (77.1% susceptible, 18.7% intermediate, 4.2% resistant). All S. Pneumoniae isolates from 1999-2000 were susceptible to levofloxacin and vancomycin and >90% were susceptible to the B-lactams (amoxicillin-clavulanate, ceftriaxone, and cefuroxime) and macrolides (axithyromycin and clarithromycin), showing that susceptibility to these agents also remained unchanged since 1997-1998. The most notable increase in resistance between the two studies was demonstrated by trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, which increased from 23.4% to 38.6%. Penicillin resistance correlated with resistance to B-lactams, macrolides, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in both studies. In H. influenzae, the prevalence of B-lactamase-producing isolates remained unchanged (10.6% in 1999-2000; 11.0% in 1997-1998). All H. influenzae isolates were susceptible to levofloxacine, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, and azithromycin, and showed no change between the two studies.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free