Evidence Hub

Maternal Knowledge and Practices in Caring for Children under Five with Pneumonia: A Cross-Sectional Study in Vietnam

Duy Thai Nguyen, Huu Xuyen Doan, P. Ngô, Tuan Viet Pham

IgMin Research, 2025

300 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Introduction: Pneumonia remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in children under five in many low- and middle-income countries. Maternal knowledge and practices play a crucial role in early detection and management.

Objective: This study aimed to enhance evidence-based practices for pneumonia prevention in children.

Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 300 mothers of children under five receiving pneumonia treatment at the National Children’s Hospital in Hanoi, Vietnam. Data were collected through a structured interview questionnaire.

Results: 83% of mothers demonstrated comprehensive knowledge of pneumonia’s clinical definition; 90.7% correctly identified its primary causes; 82.7% recognized cough as a key symptom, and 87.7% understood potential complications; 98% reported appropriate responses to early pneumonia signs, with 93% adhering to correct symptomatic management. However, knowledge gaps persisted: only 71.7% identified pneumonia risk factors, 48.7% recognized chest indrawing as a critical symptom, and 50% understood supportive measures for cough management.

Conclusion: While the study highlights strengths in maternal knowledge and clinical practices, critical gaps remain, particularly in symptom recognition and risk factor awareness. Strengthening maternal education, particularly among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups, and improving pediatric healthcare access may reduce pneumonia-related morbidity and mortality.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 300 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free