Evidence Hub

Frequency of Pneumonia and Associated Breastfeeding Status in Infants Presenting with Suspected Pneumonia in an Outpatient Setting: A Cross-Sectional Study

Hafsa Naz, Zubaida Rafiya, Erum Saboohi, Sadaf Saeed Shami, A. Khatoon, Sarah Aslam

Liaquat National Journal of Primary Care, 2026

162 participants

Abstract

Background: Pneumonia remains a major cause of infant mortality worldwide, including Pakistan, yet data on radiologically confirmed pneumonia in young infants remain limited.

Objectives: To determine the frequency of pneumonia and breastfeeding status among infants aged less than 6 months presenting with clinically suspected pneumonia in an outpatient setting.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the pediatric outpatient department at Patel Hospital, Karachi, from June, 2022 to December, 2022. Infants (n=162) aged 1-6 months of either gender, presenting with clinical suspicion of pneumonia, were included. Pneumonia was classified as positive based on signs and symptoms (difficulty breathing, tachypnoea, and hypoxemia) and radiologically confirmed by consolidation or patchy opacities. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 24.

Results: The frequency of radiologically confirmed pneumonia was 33.3%. Independent predictors were lack of antenatal breastfeeding counselling [aOR=3.01, 95% CI: 1.45-6.25, p=0.003], preterm birth [<36+6 weeks; aOR=2.89, 95% CI: 1.42-5.88, p=0.003], and maternal education below intermediate [aOR=2.34, 95% CI: 1.15-4.76, p=0.019]. Non-exclusive breastfeeding was not independently associated with pneumonia [aOR=1.36, p=0.445] but increased risk sixfold in preterm infants and threefold when counseling was absent.

Conclusion: Radiologically confirmed pneumonia occurred in 33.3% of suspected pneumonia cases among infants. Lack of antenatal…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 162 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free