Evidence Hub

Challenging Management of Postoperative Empyema: A Case Report with Literature Review

Hemn H. Kaka Ali, A. K. Abass, Ali H. Hasan, Ahmed H. Ahmed, N. A. Mohammed, T. Saeed, Marwan N. Hassan, Yadgar H. Hamakarim et al.

Judi Clinical Journal, 2025

10,000 participants

Abstract

Abstract

Introduction: Pleural empyema is the collection of pus within the pleural cavity, typically arising as a complication of pneumonia, chest trauma, thoracic surgery, or bacterial invasion of the pleural space. This report presents a case of post-surgical pleural empyema caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, successfully managed with a targeted combination of fosfomycin and colistin, with intrapleural lavage.

Case presentation: A 37-year-old male developed epigastric pain 12 days after a laparoscopic near-total gastrectomy. A chest computed tomography scan revealed a right-sided pleural empyema. Ultrasound-guided drainage was performed, followed by the intrapleural instillation of alteplase to facilitate breakdown of the loculated empyema. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was identified as the causative agent. Based on antimicrobial susceptibility, the patient received intravenous fosfomycin and colistin, along with daily pleural lavage using colistin. Inflammatory markers declined, and the patient showed notable clinical improvement.

Literature review: A review of five cases of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pleural empyema was conducted, including two carbapenem-resistant and one extensively drug-resistant case. The mean patient age was 53.8 years, and 60% (3/5) were female. Four of the five cases (80%) were confirmed using computed tomography, and all patients received antimicrobial therapy, most frequently ceftolozane/tazobactam (60%), ciprofloxacin (60%), and colistin (40%). Surgical…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 10,000 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free