Evidence Hub

Suspected triple co-infection with SARS-CoV-2, Legionella pneumophila, and Streptococcus pneumoniae after hot-spring travel: a case report

Ryutaro Hirose, Hidenori Takahashi, T. Yasuda, Kota Taguchi, Kanako Furukawa, Yugo Satake, Hiroki Nagamatsu, Naoya Toba et al.

Exploration of Medicine, 2026

Abstract

Bacterial co-infection in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can complicate diagnosis because of overlapping clinicoradiologic findings among pathogens. We report a case of suspected triple co-infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), Legionella pneumophila (L. pneumophila), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (S. pneumoniae) after hot-spring travel in a post-splenectomy patient. A man in his 70s with a history of subtotal esophagectomy and concomitant splenectomy for esophageal cancer was admitted with fever, worsening productive cough, and altered sensorium. He had recently traveled to a hot spring with a group that included his wife, who also developed a fever and was diagnosed with COVID-19. On admission, results of urinary antigen tests for L. pneumophila and S. pneumoniae were positive, a SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification test was positive, and sputum culture yielded S. pneumoniae. Chest computed tomography revealed multifocal bilateral ground-glass opacities, small bilateral pleural effusions, and relatively well-defined right middle-lobe consolidation with air bronchograms in a peribronchovascular distribution. These microbiological and radiological findings supported a suspected triple co-infection rather than COVID-19 alone. Treatment with remdesivir, ceftriaxone, and levofloxacin was initiated, and the patient’s condition improved, with better oxygenation and decreased inflammatory markers. Remdesivir and ceftriaxone…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free