Evidence Hub

Safety and tolerability of moxifloxacin in pediatric population: A systematic review of evidence based practice

Mohammed Kanan Alshammari, Noura Abdullah AlAtwi, Wejdan Mohammed Alshehri, Shatha Khaled Altwijri, Sama Abdulmohsen Alsheehe, Abdulaziz Khalaf Alshammari, Rehab Raja Alroqi, Raghad Othman Alsharafi et al.

Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 2024

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the adverse events (AEs) associated with moxifloxacin (MFX) use in children below the age of 18 years. Methods: This review was performed in conformity with the preferred items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines using different databases. Articles meeting the inclusion criteria were screened and the studies were selected for the qualitative synthesis. Results: A total of 21 studies were included in the systematic review. Among these, 7 retrospective cohort studies, 6 case reports, 3 prospective cohort studies, 2 randomized clinical trials (RCT) and the remainder utilized other methodologies. The variability in studies allowed for an assessment of the safety and tolerability of both short-term and long-term MFX administration in pediatric patients. Conclusion: Although MFX use is associated with AEs, the majority were mild and resolved on their own. The reason for QTc prolongation and elevated liver enzymes remain a question for clinicians in prescribing MFX in pediatric patients.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free