Evidence Hub

Unraveling the global landscape of Elizabethkingia antibiotic resistance: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Saade Abdalkareem Jasim, Jaafaru Sani Mohammed, Rangaswamy Roopashree, Mohammad Yahya Alshahrani, Aanchal Sharma, Abhishek Sharma, Shodiyev Asliddin, Masoumeh Beig

PLoS ONE, 2025

4 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The emergence of antibiotic-resistant Elizabethkingia strains poses a significant challenge in clinical settings. This systematic review and meta-analysis provide a comprehensive assessment of the prevalence of antibiotic resistance among Elizabethkingia isolates across different regions worldwide. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus from 1998 to January 9, 2024, using predefined search strategies. Eligible studies reporting antibiotic resistance in Elizabethkingia were included. A random-effects model was applied to estimate resistance proportions and assess heterogeneity. Additional analyses, including meta-regression, subgroup evaluations, and assessments of outliers and influential studies, were performed to explore resistance trends and evaluate publication bias. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist, and all statistical analyses were conducted using R with the metafor package. RESULTS: A total of 1,016 articles were identified, of which 34 studies (47 reports) met the inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis indicated high resistance to ceftazidime (88.5% of isolates, 95% CI: 21.1%-99.5%) with no significant heterogeneity. Resistance to rifampin was 12.5% (95% CI: 5.9%-24.7%), showing substantial heterogeneity, while ciprofloxacin resistance was 27.9% (95% CI: 13.8%-48.4%) with considerable heterogeneity. Among specific antibiotics, cefotaxime resistance was…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free