Evidence Hub

Streptococcus pneumoniae: serotype distribution, antimicrobial susceptibility, risk factors and mortality in Galicia over a two year-period

Méndez-Lage S, Losada-Castillo I, Agulla-Budiño A, Grupo de trabajo del neumococo de los hospitales de Galicia

Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica, 2015

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To examine the epidemiology of pneumococcal infection in Galicia (Spain) after the incorporation of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, and to determine serotype distribution, antibiotic susceptibility, risk factors and associated mortality in cases of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) during 2011 and 2012.

METHODS: All strains causing IPD in Galicia were studied. Serotyping was performed by agglutination and Quellung reaction. Antibiotic sensitivity to penicillin, cefotaxime, erythromycin, vancomycin, and levofloxacin was determined. The risk factors considered were chronic respiratory disease, heart disease, liver disease, kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, and HIV and non-HIV immunodeficiency.

RESULTS: A total of 555 strains were collected, with 43 different serotypes being found. The most frequently isolated ones were: serotype3 (17.5%), serotype7F (12.6%), serotype19A (9.4%), serotype14 (4.1%), serotype6C (4.1%), serotype11A (4%) and serotype22F (3.8%). 57.1% of isolates were serotypes included in VNC-13V. Two non-penicillin-sensitive strains and two others were not sensitive to cefotaxime, and 24.7% of the strains were not susceptible to erythromycin (26.9% in 2011 and 22.5% in 2012). The case fatality rate was 16.5%, reaching 23.3% in patients over 75years. Diseases with a statistically significant risk of mortality were: liver, kidney and immunodeficiency without HIV.

CONCLUSIONS: Serotype3 was the most frequent in Galicia. Very few strains were not…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free