Evidence Hub

Impact of Left Heart Disease Risk Factors on Outcomes in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Therapy

Kearney K, Brown K, Celermajer DS, Collins N, Cordina R, Corrigan C, Dwyer N, Feenstra J et al.

Chest, 2024

487 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend initial monotherapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) with cardiopulmonary comorbidities, despite limited available evidence to guide management.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Do left heart disease (LHD) risk factors have an impact on treatment response and influence applicability of risk assessment in a real-world cohort of patients with PAH?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (AMBITION) trial criteria was used to define the phenotype of patients with PAH with risk factors for LHD. Treatment strategy, functional outcome, long-term survival, and risk discrimination were compared with a reference PAH cohort using the Pulmonary Hypertension Society of Australia and New Zealand Registry.

RESULTS: A total of 487 incident patients with PAH diagnosed between 2011 and 2020 were included. Of these, 103 (21.1%) fulfilled the definition of PAH with LHD risk factors, with 384 (78.9%) remaining as the reference group. Patients in the PAH with LHD risk factors group were older (66 ± 13 vs 58 ± 19 years; P < .001), had lower pulmonary vascular resistance (393 ± 266 vs 708 ± 391 dyn.s/cm5; P = .031), and had worse 6-min walk distance (286 ± 130 vs 327 ± 136 m; P = .005) at diagnosis. The PAH with LHD risk factors group was less likely to receive initial combination therapy (27% vs 44%; P = .02). Changes in 6-min walk distance at 12 months were similar in both groups (43 ± 77 m in the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 487 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free