Evidence Hub

Comparative risk of serious hypoglycemia among persons dispensed a fluoroquinolone versus a non-fluoroquinolone antibiotic

Ellis DE, Hubbard RA, Willis AW, Zuppa AF, Zaoutis TE, Hennessy S

Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2022

917,867 participants · 14 citations

Abstract

AIM

Fluoroquinolone antibiotics have been implicated in cases of metabolic adverse events. This study investigated the causal association between fluoroquinolones and serious hypoglycemia in those with and without diabetes.

METHODS

We conducted a propensity score-matched cohort study using Optum claims data. We included adults dispensed an oral fluoroquinolone or comparator antibiotic between January 2000 and September 2015 for specific infections of interest. The outcome was serious hypoglycemia, defined using a validated algorithm. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) in diabetes and non-diabetes cohorts after matching on propensity scores fitted using confounding variables of interest.

RESULTS

Our cohort contained 119,112 individuals with diabetes and 917,867 individuals without diabetes exposed to a fluoroquinolone, matched 1:1 with a comparator. Matching produced balance (standardized mean difference < 0.1) on all variables included in the propensity score. The OR for the association between fluoroquinolones and serious hypoglycemia was 1.28 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.57) in the entire cohort, 1.30 (95% CI: 1.05-1.62) in individuals with diabetes, and 1.06 (95% CI: 0.53-2.13) in individuals without diabetes.

CONCLUSION

Fluoroquinolone users are at an increased risk of serious hypoglycemia relative to comparator antibiotic users. This association was evident only among persons diagnosed with diabetes.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 917,867 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free