Assessment of a Confined Dynamic Energy Shell in Terms of Quantum Teleportation and Quantum Tunneling: A Theoretical and Pre-Experimental Analysis of a Dual-Capsule Apparatus
Abstract
Abstract This work quantitatively assesses a multilayer, dual-capsule experimental apparatus, designed to be sited inside a mountain gallery, with respect to quantum teleportation and quantum tunneling. The apparatus is intended to create a confined, dynamic energy shell around an inner capsule by means of a 25 MV electron arc that sheathes the capsule from top to bottom, a coaxial 20 kV laser current, and rotating superconducting magnets. A three-tier epistemic distinction is used. At the first tier (established physics), the high-energy photon field can generate polarization-entangled pairs via Bethe–Heitler pair production, and these can be used for single-qubit state teleportation, with attainable fidelity F=(2F_ent+1)/3 exceeding the classical bound of 2/3. At the second tier, teleportation of a macroscopic object is shown to be impossible owing to the required ~10^29 qubits, the near-instantaneous decoherence of macroscopic superpositions, and the no-communication theorem. At the third tier, macroscopic tunneling is proven effectively impossible, since the WKB transmission probability is of order 10^(−10^25). The work delineates the apparatus's genuine quantum capacity while honestly rejecting two popular misconceptions through closed-form calculations, and provides an upper bound on the gravitational self-potential of the energy shell.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Chaos and quantum thermalization
- The Dalton quantum chemistry program system
- Quantum dots: synthesis, bioapplications, and toxicity
- Cord Blood Leptin and Adiponectin as Predictors of Adiposity in Children at 3 Years of Age: A Prospective Cohort Study
- A Guide to In Silico Drug Design
- Quantitative metabolomics by H-NMR and LC-MS/MS confirms altered metabolic pathways in diabetes
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.