Evidence Hub

Dose-averaged linear energy transfer per se does not correlate with late rectal complications in carbon-ion radiotherapy

Okonogi N, Matsumoto S, Fukahori M, Furuichi W, Inaniwa T, Matsufuji N, Imai R, Yamada S et al.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2020

134 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Several studies have focused on increasing the linear energy transfer (LET) within tumours to achieve higher biological effects in carbon-ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT). However, it remains unclear whether LET affects late complications. We assessed whether physical dose and LET distribution can be specific factors for late rectal complications in C-ion RT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall, 134 patients with uterine carcinomas were registered and retrospectively analysed. Of 134 patients, 132 who were followed up for >6 months were enrolled. The correlations between the relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted dose based on the Kanai model (the ostensible "clinical dose"), dose-averaged LET (LETd), or physical dose and rectal complications were evaluated. Rectal complications were graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria.

RESULTS: Nine patients developed grade 3 or 4 late rectal complications. Linear regression analysis found that D2cc in clinical dose was the sole risk factor for ≥grade 3 late rectal complications (p = 0.012). The receiver operating characteristic analysis found that D2cc of 60.2 Gy (RBE) was a suitable cut-off value for predicting ≥grade 3 late rectal complications. Among 35 patients whose rectal D2cc was ≥60.2 Gy (RBE), no correlations were found between severe rectal toxicities and LETd alone or physical dose per se.

CONCLUSION: We demonstrated…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 134 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free