Evidence Hub

Association between consumption of ultra-processed foods and all cause mortality: SUN prospective cohort study

Anaïs Rico-Campà, M. Martínez-González, I. Alvarez-Alvarez, Raquel de Deus Mendonça, C. de la Fuente-Arrillaga, C. Gómez-Donoso, M. Bes-Rastrollo

British medical journal, 2019

7,786 participants · 468 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objective To evaluate the association between consumption of ultra-processed foods and all cause mortality. Design Prospective cohort study. Setting Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra (SUN) cohort of university graduates, Spain 1999-2018. Participants 19 899 participants (12 113 women and 7786 men) aged 20-91 years followed-up every two years between December 1999 and February 2014 for food and drink consumption, classified according to the degree of processing by the NOVA classification, and evaluated through a validated 136 item food frequency questionnaire. Main outcome measure Association between consumption of energy adjusted ultra-processed foods categorised into quarters (low, low-medium, medium-high, and high consumption) and all cause mortality, using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. Results 335 deaths occurred during 200 432 persons years of follow-up. Participants in the highest quarter (high consumption) of ultra-processed foods consumption had a higher hazard for all cause mortality compared with those in the lowest quarter (multivariable adjusted hazard ratio 1.62, 95% confidence interval 1.13 to 2.33) with a significant dose-response relation (P for linear trend=0.005). For each additional serving of ultra-processed foods, all cause mortality relatively increased by 18% (adjusted hazard ratio 1.18, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.33). Conclusions A higher consumption of ultra-processed foods (>4 servings daily) was independently…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 7,786 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free