Evidence Hub

Investigating Polyoxometalate-Protein Interactions at Chemically Distinct Binding Sites

Paul TJ, Parac-Vogt TN, Quiñonero D, Prabhakar R

The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2018

Abstract

In this study, a combined molecular docking (rigid and flexible) and all-atom molecular dynamics simulations technique have been employed to investigate interactions of 1:1 Zr-containing Keggin polyoxometalate (ZrK) with four chemically distinct cleavage sites [Arg114-Leu115 (site 1), Ala257-Asp258 (site 2), Lys313-Asp314 (site 3), and Cys392-Glu393 (site 4)] of human serum albumin (HSA). The ZrK-HSA complexations were analyzed using electrostatic potentials, the chemical nature of amino acid residues, binding free energies, and secondary structures as parameters. They suggested that ZrK binds in a rather distinct manner to different cleavage sites, and its association was dominated by hydrogen bonding, both direct and solvent mediated, and electrostatic interactions, as suggested experimentally. The computed binding free interaction energies (-57.5, -24.2, -50.8, and -91.2 kJ/mol for sites 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively) predicted the existence of one major binding site (site 4) and three minor binding sites (site 1, site 2, and site 3). The strong exothermicity of the binding was also supported by isothermal calorimetry experiments. Additionally, the binding of ZrK did not alter the overall α-helical secondary structure of HSA, which was in line with experimental observation. Furthermore, hydrolysis of the peptide bonds of the substrate was found to retain its overall structure. These results have provided a deeper understanding of the complex ZrK interactions with proteins,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a experimental / empirical study, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free