Evidence Hub

On the In Silico Evaluation of the Emission Quantum Yield of Cyclometalated Ir(III) Complexes

Iván Soriano-Díaz, Alicia Omist, Ilya D. Dergachev, Sergey A. Varganov, Enrique Ortí, Angelo Giussani

Inorganic Chemistry, 2025

3 citations

Abstract

The in silico determination of the emission quantum yield (Φ em ) of a cyclometalated Ir(III) complex requires the evaluation of all its possible radiative and nonradiative decays. The task is challenging, particularly when more than one minimum is present on the potential energy surface of the emitting lowest-energy triplet T 1, a situation more common than what was previously thought. In the present contribution, we study all possible radiative and nonradiative paths for the two cyclometalated Ir(III) complexes, [Ir(ppy) 2 (pyim)] + and [Ir(diFppy) 2 (dtb-bpy)] +, indeed characterized by T 1 minima of both metal-to-ligand charge transfer and ligand-centered nature. Comparing the computed emission quantum yields accounting for all processes and for only those processes in principle more relevant, we aimed at judging the importance of characterizing all decays to provide an accurate estimation of Φ em . Evaluating the barrier between emitting T 1 and nonradiative 3 MC states obtaining the corresponding transition state or approximating the latter using the CI-NEB method, we aimed at judging the importance of performing transition state optimizations. The latter task, due to its intrinsic complexity and poor convergence behavior, is a bottleneck for the characterization of the photophysics of a complex and consequently prevents a more efficient screening of cyclometalated Ir(III) complexes for technological applications.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a simulation / modelling, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free