Evidence Hub

Physics-aware imaging AI for quantitative MASLD biomarker mapping: a systematic review of deep learning and radiomics across ultrasound, CT, and MRI.

H. Maghsoudi, Ahmad Khonche, Reza Gereami, Farshad Gharebakhshi

Abdominal Radiology, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review critically appraises the current landscape of physics-aware artificial intelligence (AI) in medical imaging for quantitative biomarker mapping in Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and its progressive form, MASH. It focuses on deep learning and radiomics applications across ultrasound, CT, and MRI.

Methods: A PRISMA 2020-guided systematic review was conducted, searching PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from 2015 to 2025. Studies applying AI to imaging for automated segmentation, quantitative steatosis/iron/fibrosis mapping, or staging in MASLD/MASH were included. Data on technical approaches, physics-aware design, reference standards, performance, and deployment readiness were extracted and synthesized narratively.

Results: Of 842 identified records, 33 studies were included. MRI leads in biophysically-grounded fat/iron quantification (PDFF, R2*) using confounder-corrected sequences and automated whole-liver segmentation. CT excels in scalable, opportunistic steatosis assessment via fully automated volumetric attenuation and dual-energy virtual non-contrast, though performance is phase-dependent. Ultrasound bifurcates into physics-informed quantitative ultrasound (attenuation/backscatter) correlating with MRI-PDFF and B-mode deep learning for steatosis grading, with emerging domain-adaptation techniques. Evidence strength and external validation are most robust for CT and MRI automation, while ultrasound…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free