Evidence Hub

Exercise interventions in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

S. López-Ortiz, P. L. Valenzuela, María M. Seisdedos, Javier S. Morales, Tomás Vega, Adrián Castillo-García, R. Nisticò, N. Mercuri et al.

Ageing Research Reviews, 2021

1,337 participants · 144 citations

Abstract

AIMS

To assess the potential multi-domain benefits of exercise interventions on patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), as well as to determine the specific effects of different exercise modalities (aerobic, strength, or combined training).

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science until March 2021 for randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of exercise interventions (compared with no exercise) on patients with AD. Outcomes included cognitive function (mini-mental state examination [MMSE] test), physical function (e.g., 6-minute walking test [6MWT]), functional independence (Barthel index), and neuropsychiatric symptoms (Neuropsychiatric Inventory [NPI]). A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

28 studies (total n=1,337 participants, average age 79-90 years) were included in the systematic review, of which 21 could be meta-analyzed. Although considerable heterogeneity was found, exercise interventions induced several significant benefits, including in Barthel index (n=147 patients, mean difference [MD]=8.36 points, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.63-16.09), 6MWT (n=369, MD=84 meters, 95% CI=44-133)), and NPI (n=263, MD=-4.4 points, 95% CI=-8.42--0.38). Benefits were also found in the MMSE test, albeit significance was only reached for aerobic exercise (n=187, MD=2.31 points, 95% CI 0.45-4.27).

CONCLUSIONS

Exercise interventions appear to exert multi-domain benefits in patients with AD.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,337 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free