A meta‐analysis of anal cancer incidence by risk group: Toward a unified anal cancer risk scale
Abstract
Certain population groups are known to have higher than average anal cancer risk, namely persons living with HIV (PLHIV), men who have sex with men (MSM), women diagnosed with human papillomavirus (HPV)‐related gynecological precancerous lesions or cancer, solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) and patients with autoimmune diseases. Our aim was to provide robust and comparable estimates of anal cancer burden across these groups. Summary incidence rates (IRs), as cases per 100 000 person‐years (py), were calculated by fixed‐effects meta‐analysis. IRs were 85 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 82‐89) for HIV‐positive MSM (n = 7 studies; 2 229 234 py), 32 (95% CI = 30‐35) for non‐MSM male PLHIV (n = 5; 1626 448 py) and 22 (95% CI = 19‐24) for female PLHIV (n = 6; 1 472 123 py), with strong variation by age (eg, from 16.8 10 years after transplant. Anal cancer IRs were 10 (95% CI = 5‐19), 6 (95% CI = 3‐11) and 3 (95% CI = 2‐4) for systemic lupus erythematosus, ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, respectively. In conclusion, a unifying anal cancer risk scale, based upon comprehensive meta‐analysis, can improve prioritization and standardization in anal cancer prevention/research initiatives, which are in their public health infancy.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Global, regional, and national burden of hepatitis B, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019
- Global fertility in 204 countries and territories, 1950–2021, with forecasts to 2100: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021
- Exercise interventions in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Prognostic Significance of Carbonic Anhydrase IX Expression in Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis
- Glucocorticoid Resistance: Is It a Requisite for Increased Cytokine Production in Depression? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Global incidence of surgical site infection after appendectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.