Evidence Hub

A meta-analysis of a year of virtual-based learning amidst the COVID-19 crisis: Possible solutions or problems?

D. Juandi, M. Tamur, B. A. Martadiputra, Kurnila V. S. Suparman

AIP Conference Proceedings, 2022

11 citations

Abstract

The shift in perspective brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic crisis regardmg the reorganization of leammg practices culminated ma shift toward a virtual-based learning process (VBL). Numerous individual research on the effects of VBL have been conducted in 2020, with mixed fmdmgs. A meta-analysis was performed to pool similar findings and to view the fmdmgs in the context of future VBL implementation. We searched the ERIC, SAGE, and Google Scholar databases for corresponding studies published in 2020. We estimated a random effects model using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) program. The study showed that VBL had a modest effect on student learning outcomes in general (ES = 0.67 SE = 0.15) Moderator research demonstrates that VBL is applied successfully when the media used and the domain being evaluated are considered. The implications of the research results and the differences in the effectiveness of VBL between countnes are discussed, thus providing important information as a basic idea for further VBL research and development. © 2022 American Institute of Physics Inc.. All rights reserved.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free