Evidence Hub

Randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled trial of efficacy and safety of quantum molecular resonance for treating meibomian gland dysfunction

Lita Uthaithammarat, N. Kasetsuwan, Usanee Reinprayoon, Y. Chongpison, W. Quanchareonsap, Paphaphat Dissaneevate

Eye, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

This randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial aimed to evaluate the novel quantum molecular resonance (QMR) device for meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) treatment. Eighty participants diagnosed with MGD were randomized into QMR or sham-QMR groups. Each procedure was performed on days 0, 7, 14, and 21. Primary (meibum quality score) and other secondary outcomes were examined at baseline and weeks 7 and 11. Tear osmolarity and interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-1 receptor agonist levels were evaluated at baseline and week 7. Adverse events were recorded. A multilevel mixed-effect linear regression model was used for data analysis. Meibum quality (p = 0.008), corneal/conjunctival fluorescein staining score (p = 0.036), telangiectatic vessel area (p = 0.008), and superior (p = 0.011) and inferior (p = 0.020) lid meiboscale were significantly improved in the QMR group than those in the sham-treated group at week 11. Superior lid meiboscale (p = 0.027) and meibomian gland plugging grade (MGPG) (p = 0.017) were significantly improved in the QMR group at week 7. In the QMR group, Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores and lid margin thickening grades were significantly lesser at weeks 7 (p = 0.002 and <0.001, respectively) and 11 (both p < 0.001) than the baseline values. At week 7, IL-6 levels were significantly decreased only in the QMR group (p = 0.016). All other parameters did not significantly differ. No serious adverse event occurred. The QMR device was effective for MGD…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free