Evidence Hub

Quizartinib for Newly Diagnosed FLT3-Internal Tandem Duplication–Negative AML: The Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II QUIWI Study

P. Montesinos, R. Rodríguez-Veiga, J. Bergua, Jesús Lorenzo Algarra Algarra, C. Botella, E. Rodríguez-Arbolí, T. Bernal, M. Tormo et al.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2025

273 participants · 15 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE Quizartinib, an oral, selective, second-generation, type-II FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor with high binding affinity to internal tandem duplication (ITD) and wild-type (WT) FLT3, has shown early clinical activity as monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory FLT3-ITD–negative AML. The phase III QuANTUM-First trial showed that quizartinib significantly prolonged survival versus placebo when added to standard chemotherapy, followed by single-agent maintenance, in patients with newly diagnosed (ND) FLT3-ITD–positive AML. We investigated the safety and efficacy of quizartinib in patients with ND FLT3-ITD–negative AML. METHODS The phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled QUIWI trial enrolled patients age 18-70 years with ND FLT3-ITD–negative (mutant-to-WT allelic ratio <0.03) AML. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive standard induction and consolidation chemotherapy combined with either quizartinib 60 mg once daily or placebo, followed by single-agent maintenance with quizartinib or placebo. The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS) and safety. RESULTS Overall, 273 patients were randomly assigned to quizartinib (n = 180) or placebo (n = 93). At data cutoff, median EFS was 20.4 months and 9.9 months in the quizartinib and placebo arms, respectively (P = .046). Median OS was not reached and 29.3 months in the quizartinib and placebo arms, respectively (P = .012);…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 273 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free