Evidence Hub

Beyond Technology: The Impact of Personal Physics Consultation on Patient Anxiety in Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

D. Levin, E. Shekel, H. Rosenfeld, G. Grinfeld, Ronit Lashkovitzer, Y. Tova, M. A. Ben-David, Benjamin W. Corn et al.

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 2025

241 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the effects of technological vs interpersonal psychoeducational interventions in reducing treatment-related anxiety in breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective randomized controlled trial enrolled 241 breast cancer patients, randomizing them into three arms: video education (n=51), medical physicist consultation (n=92), and standard care (n=98). The video education group viewed an informational video prior to simulation, while the physicist consultation group received personalized treatment plan explanations before their first treatment. Anxiety levels were assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and Distress Thermometer (DT) at four timepoints: post-initial consultation, post-simulation, post-first treatment, and treatment completion.

RESULTS

Baseline anxiety scores were comparable across all groups following initial consultation. Medical physicist consultation patients demonstrated significantly lower DT scores after first treatment compared to both video education (p<0.0043) and standard care groups (p<0.0051). While video education and standard care groups showed significant anxiety reduction between first and last treatments through habituation, the medical physicist group maintained consistently lower anxiety levels throughout treatment, suggesting earlier anxiety resolution through interpersonal intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct patient education by medical physicists resulted in more…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 241 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free