Evidence Hub

A Pooled Analysis for Eight Randomized Controlled Trials of Istradefylline, an Adenosine A 2A Receptor Antagonist: Efficacy as Adjunct to Levodopa in Parkinson’s Disease (PD) (P3.8-030)

S. Isaacson, N. Hattori, M. Onofrj, A. Mori, K. Toyama, P. Salzman, M. Cantillon, E. Ohta et al.

Neurology, 2019

3,245 participants

Abstract

Objective: Pooled efficacy analyses of eight randomized, placebo-controlled studies of istradefylline combined with levodopa in patients with PD and motor fluctuations. Background: Istradefylline, a well-tolerated selective adenosine A2A receptor antagonist, acts via the indirect basal ganglia outflow pathway. In 2013, doses of 20 and 40mg/day were approved in Japan as adjunctive treatment to levodopa-containing products in patients with PD experiencing wearing-off phenomena. Design/Methods: Istradefylline was evaluated in patients with PD who concomitantly received levodopa with carbidopa or benserazide and experienced motor-response fluctuations (n=3245 randomized). Eight 12- or 16-week randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind Phase 2b/3 clinical studies were conducted globally; change in OFF-time in daily, patient-completed 24-hour ON/OFF diaries provided the primary endpoint. Seven of eight studies shared common methodology. Pooled analysis results from once-daily oral istradefylline (20 and 40mg/day) and placebo, evaluated using a mixed-model repeated-measures approach (including study as a variable), are presented. Results: The pooled analysis included 2719 treated patients (placebo, n=992; 20 mg/day, n=848; 40 mg/day, n=879). At week 12, OFF-hours/day with 20 and 40mg istradefylline was reduced (LS mean difference from placebo in reduction from baseline [95%CI], −0.38 [−0.61, −0.15] and −0.45 [−0.68, −0.22], respectively). ON-hours/day without troublesome…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 3,245 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free