Evidence Hub

Effect of alternative positions of neonates prior to delayed cord clamping on placental transfusion: a randomized control trial

Ridhimaa Jain, Ashish Jain, Veena Devgan, Jerin C Sekhar

Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2018

102 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objective: To determine the effect of alternative positions (relative to placenta) of normal term neonates, prior to the recommended delayed cord clamping, on placental transfusion and short-term neonatal outcome. Methods: Normal term neonates born vaginally were randomly assigned to be placed either on mother’s abdomen (Group AL, n = 97) or 20 cm below the introitus (Group BL, n = 102) for 90 seconds after delivery. Subsequently the cord was clamped. Outcome measures were anthropometry, hematological profile including ferritin at birth and at 3–4 months; and adverse effects, polycythemia, and jaundice. Results: Both groups had comparable outcome measures at birth. At 3–4 months, mean hemoglobin (AL: 12.0 ± 0.9 g/dl, BL: 12.3 ± 1.1 g/dl; p = .02, 95% CI: 0.03–0.58) and hematocrit (AL: 36.1 ± 2.7%, BL: 37 ± 3.2%; p = .01, 95% CI: 0.1–1.75) were significantly higher in BL group. Anthropometry, serum ferritin, incidence of anemia and iron deficiency at 3–4 months were similar in both groups. There was no significant difference in polycythemia, jaundice requiring phototherapy or respiratory distress between the two groups. Conclusions: Placing the baby below the placenta resulted in a statistically significant increase in hemoglobin and hematocrit at 3–4 months without any adverse outcomes. However, this meager quantum of increase did not translate into reduction of risk of anemia or improvement in iron stores.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 102 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free