Evidence Hub

First-In-Human Evaluation of [18F]Fluproxadine for Norepinephrine Transporter PET: Biodistribution, Dosimetry, and Safety

Yamane T, Iimori H, Akamatsu G, Ikari Y, Hoda Y, Shimizu K, Matsumoto K, Senda M et al.

Clinical nuclear medicine, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current norepinephrine transporter (NET) tracers used for cardiac sympathetic imaging and oncology are limited by radiosynthesis complexity, suboptimal image quality, or operational constraints. [18F]fluproxadine (formerly [18F]AF78) was developed to address these limitations by providing high NET affinity, favorable biodistribution, and an operationally straightforward radiosynthesis. We therefore conducted the first-in-human evaluation of this new class of [18F] labeled NET PET tracer to assess its safety, biodistribution, radiation dosimetry, and imaging characteristics.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study, 4 healthy adult volunteers received [18F]fluproxadine (101.8-204.0 MBq). Dynamic whole-body PET/CT acquisitions were obtained 10 times from 1 to 232 minutes postinjection, and vital signs, laboratory tests, and adverse events were monitored. Time-activity curves were generated for major organs, including myocardium from the whole-body scans, and organ-absorbed doses and effective dose were estimated using OLINDA/EXM v2.0 from time-integrated activities. Myocardial uptake and target-to-background behavior were assessed using semiquantitative methods. Radiosynthesis performance and key operational steps were documented to assess practical scalability.

RESULTS: Radiosynthesis of [18F]fluproxadine was operationally straightforward with encouraging yields and fewer specialized steps than some legacy tracers. Imaging was completed without serious adverse…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free