Evidence Hub

Carbon-Ion Radiation Therapy as Nonsurgical Treatment for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: 5-Year Results From the Phase 2 Part of the First Prospective Clinical Trial

Okonogi N, Karasawa K, Murata K, Omatsu T, Murata H, Wakatsuki M, Ishikawa H

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2026

6 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the long-term efficacy, safety, and cosmetic outcomes of carbon-ion radiation therapy (C-ion RT) as a nonsurgical treatment option for patients with early-stage breast cancer.

Methods and materials: This single-center, prospective phase 1/2 trial enrolled women aged ≥60 years with stage I (cT1N0M0), estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-negative invasive ductal carcinoma, ≤2 cm in diameter. Patients received C-ion RT at a total dose of 60 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 4 fractions, followed by adjuvant aromatase inhibitors. The primary endpoint was 5-year local control. Secondary endpoints included complete response (CR) rate, adverse events (AEs), cosmetic outcomes, disease-free survival, and overall survival. Imaging was used for evaluating tumor response, and follow-up was conducted for a median of 73 months.

Results: Twelve patients were treated in the phase 2 component of the trial. The CR rate was 100%, with a median time to CR of 12 months (range, 4-36 months). The 5-year local control and disease-free survival rates were both 92%, and the overall survival rate was 100%. One case of in-field recurrence occurred in a patient with a high Ki-67 index. Acute grade 1 dermatitis was observed in 6 patients. No grade ≥2 acute AEs were reported. Regarding late AEs, grade 1 rib fractures (n = 2) and grade 1 mastitis-related pain (n = 3) were managed conservatively. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 6 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free