Evidence Hub

A Phase 1/2 Study of Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy With Concurrent Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Uterine Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma (Protocol 1302)

Okonogi N, Wakatsuki M, Kato S, Karasawa K, Miyasaka Y, Murata H, Nakano T, Kamada T et al.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2019

11 citations

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of carbon-ion radiation therapy (C-ion RT) with concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced uterine cervical squamous cell carcinoma in a phase 1/2 clinical trial.

Methods and materials: Twenty-two patients were treated with C-ion RT with concurrent weekly cisplatin at a dose of 40 mg/m2. The phase 1 component evaluated the safety of 72.0 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) of C-ion RT with concurrent chemotherapy. In the phase 2 component, the safety and efficacy of C-ion RT with concurrent chemotherapy were assessed using the dose determined in phase 1.

Results: The median follow-up period was 32 months, and the median tumor size was 71 mm (range, 51-150 mm). No patient had dose-limiting toxicities in the phase 1 component; the recommended dose was determined to be 72.0 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) with 40 mg/m2 of cisplatin. In the phase 2 component, 2 patients developed grade 3 gastrointestinal tract toxicities. In patients treated with the recommended dose, the 2-year local control (LC), LC including salvage therapy, and overall survival rates were 67%, 81%, and 82%, respectively. The 2-year LC and overall survival rates for patients with tumor sizes ≤7.1 cm were 92% and 100%, respectively; for those with tumor sizes >7.1 cm they were 33% and 60%, respectively.

Conclusions: C-ion RT with concurrent weekly cisplatin was tolerated by patients with locally advanced uterine cervical squamous cell carcinoma.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free