Evidence Hub

Assessing the impact of correlated noise in digital mammography: a virtual clinical trial

Lucas E Soares, R. Brandão, L. Borges, R. F. Caron, B. Barufaldi, Andrew D. A. Maidment, Marcelo A. C. Vieira

Medical Imaging, 2023

3 citations

Abstract

In digital mammography, the physics of the acquisition system and post-processing algorithms can cause image noise to be spatially correlated. Noise correlation is characterized by non-constant noise power spectral density and can negatively affect image quality. Although the literature explores ways to quantify the frequency dependence of noise in digital mammography, there is still a lack of studies that explore the effect of this phenomenon on clinical tasks. Thus, the aim of this work is to evaluate the impact of noise correlation on the quality of digital mammography and the detectability of lesions using a virtual clinical trial (VCT) tool. Considering the radiographic factors of a standard full-dose acquisition, VCT was used to generate two sets of images: one containing mammograms corrupted with correlated noise and the other with uncorrelated (white) noise. Clusters of five to seven microcalcifications of different sizes and shapes were computationally inserted into the images at regions of dense tissue. We then designed a human observer study to investigate performance on a clinical task of locating microcalcifications on digital mammography from both image sets. In addition, nine objective image quality metrics were calculated on mammograms. The results obtained with four medical physicists showed that the average performance in localization was 72% for images with correlated noise and 95% with uncorrelated noise. Thus, our results suggest that correlated noise…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free