Evidence Hub

Clinical Outcomes in Patients With FLT3-ITD-Mutated Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant After Quizartinib or Salvage Chemotherapy in the QuANTUM-R Trial

S. Ganguly, J. Cortes, A. Krämer, M. Levis, G. Martinelli, A. Perl, N. Russell, M. Arunachalam et al.

Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2020

367 participants · 28 citations

Abstract

Despite the substantial clinical activity of fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitors in relapsed or refractory (R/R) FLT3-ITD‒positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML), durable remissions and prolonged survival in this population require allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT). Quizartinib, a once-daily, oral, highly potent and selective FLT3 inhibitor, significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and improved clinical benefit compared with salvage chemotherapy (median OS, 6.2 vs 4.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.76 [95% CI, 0.58-0.98]; P = 0.018; composite complete remission [CRc] rate, 48% vs 27%; median duration of CRc, 2.8 vs 1.2 months; mortality rates, 0.8% vs 14% [by day 30], 7% vs 24% [by day 60]) in patients with R/R FLT3-ITD AML in the phase 3 QuANTUM-R trial. In this post hoc analysis, we described the characteristics of and clinical outcomes in patients who underwent an on-study HSCT in QuANTUM-R per investigator discretion and institutional practices. Of 367 randomized patients, 78 (32%) in the quizartinib arm and 14 (11%) in the salvage chemotherapy arm underwent an on-study allo-HSCT without any intervening therapy for AML after quizartinib or study-specified salvage chemotherapy. Pooled data of patients from both treatment arms showed a longer median OS in transplanted patients vs those treated without a transplant (12.2 vs 4.4 months; HR, 0.315 [95% CI, 0.233-0.427]). Pooled data also showed a longer median OS in patients with a last…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 367 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free