Evidence Hub

Effect of a Matrix Therapy Agent on Corneal Epithelial Healing After Standard Collagen Cross-linking in Patients With Keratoconus: A Randomized Clinical Trial

A. Bata, K. Witkowska, Piotr A. Woźniak, K. Fondi, G. Schmidinger, N. Pircher, S. Szegedi, Valentin Aranha Dos Santos et al.

JAMA ophthalmology, 2016

40 participants · 32 citations

Abstract

Importance

Corneal abrasions are frequent after standard (epithelium-off [epi-off]) corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) in patients with progressive keratoconus. A new matrix therapy agent (ReGeneraTing Agent [RGTA]) has been developed to promote corneal wound healing.

Objective

To assess the effect of the new type of matrix therapy agent on corneal wound healing after epi-off CXL in patients with keratoconus.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This double-masked randomized clinical trial enrolled 40 patients with keratoconus undergoing epi-off CXL from July 18, 2014, to October 21, 2015, when the last follow-up was completed. The analysis of the intention-to-treat population was performed at the Department of Clinical Pharmacology in cooperation with the Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering and the Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry of the Medical University of Vienna.

Interventions

Patients were randomized to receive the matrix therapy agent or hyaluronic acid-containing eyedrops, 0.1%, every other day starting immediately after surgery. The size of the corneal defect was measured using ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography (OCT) and slitlamp photography (SLP) with fluorescein staining.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Corneal wound healing rate, defined as the size of the defect over time.

Results

Among the 40 patients undergoing epi-off CXL (31 men; 9 women; mean [SD] age, 31 [10] years), wound healing was significantly faster in the matrix…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 40 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free