Evidence Hub

Spectrally Resolved Fundus Autofluorescence as a Biomarker of Retinal Metabolic Integrity in Intermediate and Atrophic AMD

Vujosevic S, Zanzottera E, Brotto L, Piccoli G, Alovisi C, Bucceri V, Rui C, Poletti E et al.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2026

62 participants

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the association between spectrally resolved fundus autofluorescence (Sr-FAF) signals and four macular lesion types identified on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT): (1) drusen, (2) incomplete retinal pigment epithelial and outer retinal atrophy (iRORA) and complete retinal pigment epithelium and outer retinal atrophy (cRORA), (3) retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and outer retinal atrophy, and (4) nascent geographic atrophy (nGA) in eyes with intermediate and atrophic age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Methods: This cross-sectional observational study analyzed 775 SD-OCT B-scans from 62 eyes (62 patients) with AMD. Lesions were classified according to established OCT criteria (290 drusen, 49 iRORA, 390 cRORA, 46 nGA). All eyes underwent SD-OCT imaging (97 B-scans) and Sr-FAF using a 450-nm wavelength. Quantitative Sr-FAF metrics (average red emission fluorescence component [REFC] and average green emission fluorescence component [GEFC]) were determined using custom software, and lesion groups were compared via one-way analysis of variance with Scheffé post hoc testing.

Results: Significant differences among lesion types were observed for REFC (F = 59.3, P < 0.001) and GEFC (F = 13.5, P < 0.001). Drusen exhibited higher REFC intensities than iRORA, cRORA, and nGA (all P < 0.001), and higher GEFC intensities than cRORA (P < 0.001) and nGA (P = 0.002). Wavelength (nm) progressively decreased from drusen to iRORA, nGA, and cRORA.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 62 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free