Evidence Hub

Superficial high-dose-rate brachytherapy for primary tumors and relapses after surgery in patients with basal cell carcinoma of the head and neck region: results of a retrospective comparative cohort study

Chyrek AJ, Chicheł A, Burchardt WM, Bielęda G, Jankowska M, Moczko J, Roszak A

Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2022

90 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Purpose: The recommended treatments for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) in the head and neck (H&N) region are Mohs surgery, standard surgical excision (SSE), and radiotherapy. According to the literature, local recurrence after surgical treatment in this area is associated with a worse prognosis in case of re-treatment. To our knowledge, there are no reports on high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) for BCC of the H&N region, both in primary lesions and relapses after SSE. This study aimed to fill this gap in the literature.

Material and methods: Inclusion criteria were pathologically confirmed BCC, tumor location in the H&N region, treatment performed with superficial HDR-BT, and a minimum follow-up of 12 months. An analysis was performed on a group of 90 patients, in whom a total of 102 tumors were treated. Subsequently, tumors were divided into two sub-groups, including those treated initially, and treated due to local recurrence after previous SSE. Primary treatment group (PrG) included 59 tumors, whereas 43 tumors were included in recurrent group (ReG).

Results: Statistical analysis did not reveal any significant differences between the groups in terms of age (p = 0.43), treatment duration (p = 0.17), follow-up time (p = 0.96), sex (p = 0.18), local advancement (p = 0.83), and location (p = 0.68). The estimated 5-year relapse-free survival was 96.4% in the PrG and 94.6% in the ReG group, and the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.72). In the PrG, skin…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 90 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free