Evidence Hub

Monitoring long-term efficacy of iron chelation therapy by deferiprone and desferrioxamine in patients with beta-thalassaemia major: application of SQUID biomagnetic liver susceptometry

Fischer R, Longo F, Nielsen P, Engelhardt R, Hider RC, Piga A

British journal of haematology, 2003

51 participants

Abstract

In this non-randomized prospective study, liver and spleen iron concentrations were monitored annually over a 4-year period by non-invasive Superconducting Quantum Interference Device biomagnetometry in 54 beta-thalassaemia major patients (age, 7-22 years) receiving treatment with deferiprone (75 mg/kg/d). Median liver iron concentrations increased significantly from 1456 to 2029 and 2449 microg/g(liver) at baseline, after 2.0 and 3.2 years respectively. Another group of 51 thalassaemic patients (aged 4-34 years) who received desferrioxamine s.c. for 1.9 years increased their liver iron concentration from 1076 to 1260 microg/g(liver). Taking into account the increase of the daily iron input from transfusions of 3.6 mg/d, caused by weight gain in 67% of the patients treated with deferiprone, a larger total body iron elimination rate was achieved after 2 years than at baseline. A negative ferritin change was observed in 51% of the patients. In 15 non-splenectomized patients, liver iron significantly increased from 1260 to 1937 microg/g(liver) (P < 0.01), but serum ferritin remained stable at 2100 microg/l, as did the spleen iron concentration at 1200 microg/g(spleen). A two-compartment model may predict an average chelation efficacy for desferrioxamine and deferiprone, with a saturation effect of the latter, for a certain chelation and transfusion regimen by a single liver iron quantification.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 51 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free