Evidence Hub

Involuntary inspiratory sigh in multiple system atrophy: A clinical and cerebral blood flow study

Nakagawa Y, Sugiyama A, Nakano Y, Yokota H, Hirano S, Namiki M, Yamamoto T, Yamanaka Y et al.

Journal of the neurological sciences, 2026

90 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Involuntary inspiratory sigh (IIS) is a characteristic symptom of multiple system atrophy (MSA) and a supportive non-motor feature in the current diagnostic criteria. However, IIS during wakefulness has not been systematically investigated.

OBJECTIVES: This study explored the clinical significance and neural correlates of IIS by comparing clinical characteristics and cerebral blood flow (CBF) single-photon emission computed tomography findings between patients with and without IIS, and evaluated a practical method for IIS assessment.

METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 90 patients with clinically established or probable MSA. IIS was assessed via structured interview and direct examination. Patients were classified as IIS-positive if either method yielded positive results. Clinical characteristics were compared between IIS-positive and IIS-negative patients. Agreement between the two detection methods was examined. CBF was also compared between groups.

RESULTS: IIS was identified in 21 (23.3%) of 90 patients. The IIS-positive patients showed higher Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale Part I scores and REM Sleep Behavior Disorder Screening Questionnaire scores, and more frequent severe orthostatic hypotension in exploratory comparisons. Interview- and examination-based IIS assessments showed moderate agreement, and IIS was significantly more likely to be detected during interviews than during examinations. The IIS-positive patients exhibited reduced…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 90 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free