Evidence Hub

A cross-sectional study to investigate short duration toxic consequences of smoking to lungs of asymptomatic smokers through spirometry and 6 min walk test

BHUPENDRA KUMAR JAIN, Ashwin Songra

Asian Journal of Medical Sciences, 2022

160 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Cigarette smokers have a lower level of pulmonary function and physical fitness than non-smokers. Very little information is available for the short-term effects of smoking to lungs of asymptomatic smokers.

Aims and Objectives: The main focus of this study is to evaluate short duration toxic consequences of smoking to the lungs of asymptomatic smokers through spirometry and 6 min walk test (6MWT).

Materials and Methods: The present study is an observational cross-sectional study conducted in a tertiary care hospital which includes 160 individuals, 80 smokers and 80 non-smokers. The spirometric variables and 6MWT were performed to quantify smoking exposure. The whole statistics was analyzed using SPSS 21 and the mean between two groups was compared after applying standard Chi-square test. The means across more than 2 groups were compared after applying the standard analysis of variance (ANOVA) test.

Results: Most of lung function parameter such as forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), FEV1%, FEV1/forced vital capacity % (FVC%), maximum mid-expiratory flow 25–75%, peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), PEFR%, and maximum voluntary ventilation % is decreased significantly in asymptomatic smokers than non-smokers except FVC and FVC%. The 6MWT distance is also reduced gradually and significantly in asymptomatic smokers from 1–5 pack-years to 15–20 pack-years.

Conclusion: Lung function parameters and 6MWT decreased significantly in asymptomatic smoker with increased…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 160 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free