Evidence Hub

DOP60 Prevalence of undiagnosed inflammatory Bowel Disease in patients with spondyloarthritis: EISER Study

A. Casbas, I. Rodríguez-Lago, I. Marín-Jiménez, Z. Plaza, J. Gratacós, E. Trujillo, E. Pérez-Pampín, M. B. de Acosta et al.

Journal of Crohn's & Colitis, 2024

559 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

A significant proportion of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have concomitant rheumatological manifestations. Patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) often report gastrointestinal symptoms, some of them being associated to IBD. However, the exact prevalence of this disorder is still controversial, and the optimal approach to its diagnosis remains unknown.

Aim: to determine the prevalence of undiagnosed IBD in patients with axial SpA and psoriatic arthritis (PA). EISER is an observational, cross-sectional study carried out in13 Spanish hospitals. Patients ≥18 years-old diagnosed with PA or SpA were selected. Patients receiving biologics or systemic steroids were excluded. Among patients ≥ 50 years, only those without valid colonoscopy in the previous 3 years were included. Rheumatologists performed a baseline visit and collected demographic, clinical data. Fecal calprotectin (FC) was determined by the Quantum Blue rapid test and this was followed by a gastroenterologist consultation. Figure 1 summarizes study protocol.

A total of 559 patients were included (51% men; mean 52.2 years; mean disease duration of SpA/PA was 12.3 years). The most frequent disease was radiographic SpA (37%), followed by peripheral APs (36%). Tabla 1 shows demographic characteristics of patients. A total of 40% of patients has FC ≥ 80 ug/g. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis factors associated with a greater likelihood of FC ≥ 80 µg/g were disease duration (OR 1.021, 95%CI…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 559 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free