Evidence Hub

Accelerating quasiparticle physics: a review on the synergy of machine learning and density functional theory for excitons, polaritons, and plasmons

H. Alavi-Rad, Mahyar Hassani-Vasmejani, Meysam Bagheri Tagani

Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 2026

Abstract

Quasiparticles such as excitons, polaritons, and plasmons are central to understanding the optical and electronic properties of modern materials, with profound implications for optoelectronics, renewable energy, and quantum information science. The theoretical investigation of these many-body phenomena heavily relies on computationally intensive methods like density functional theory (DFT) and its extensions. However, the high computational cost and poor scaling of these methods present a significant bottleneck for studying large, complex systems or performing high-throughput material screening. This review discusses the emerging and transformative role of machine learning (ML) in overcoming these challenges. We begin by providing a foundational overview of the physics of excitons, polaritons, and plasmons. We then outline the standard DFT-based approaches used to model them, highlighting their capabilities and limitations. The core of this review is dedicated to exploring the multifaceted ways in which ML is being integrated with first-principles calculations. We categorize the role of ML into several key paradigms: (i) acting as surrogate models to accelerate the prediction of quasiparticle properties, (ii) building size-transferable Hamiltonians to bridge nano and meso-scales, (iii) classifying complex phases and patterns in many-body systems, and (iv) solving the inverse problem of determining system parameters from experimental observables. By surveying recent…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free