Macromolecular structure comparison and docking: an algorithmic review
Abstract
The comparison of macromolecular structures, in terms of functionalities, is a crucial step when aiming to identify potential docking sites. Drug designers require the identification of such docking sites for the binding of two proteins, in order to form a stable complex. This paper presents a review of current approaches to macromolecular structure comparison and docking, following an algorithmic approach. We describe techniques based on the Bayesian framework, kernel-based methods, projection-based techniques and spectral approaches. We introduce the use of quantum particle swarm optimization, in order to aid us to find the most appropriate docking sites. We discuss the importance of the heat and Schrodinger equations to address the non-rigid nature of proteins and highlight the strengths and limitations of the various methods.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Quantum dots: synthesis, bioapplications, and toxicity
- A Guide to In Silico Drug Design
- Quantum Computing for Healthcare: A Review
- Automated in Silico Design of Homogeneous Catalysts
- Identification of Novel 3-Hydroxy-pyran-4-One Derivatives as Potent HIV-1 Integrase Inhibitors Using in silico Structure-Based Combinatorial Library Design Approach
- In silico structural elucidation of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase towards the identification of potential Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus inhibitors
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.