Evidence Hub

Combined MD/QTAIM techniques to evaluate ligand-receptor interactions. Scope and limitations

Rojas S, Parravicini O, Vettorazzi M, Tosso R, Garro A, Gutiérrez L, Andújar S, Enriz R

European journal of medicinal chemistry, 2020

Abstract

In medicinal chemistry, it is extremely important to evaluate, as accurately as possible, the molecular interactions involved in the formation of different ligand-receptor (L-R) complexes. Evaluating the different molecular interactions by quantum mechanics calculations is not a simple task, since formation of an L-R complex is a dynamic process. In this case, the use of combined techniques of molecular dynamics (MD) and quantum calculations is one the best possible approaches. In this work we report a comparative study using combined MD and QTAIM (Quantum Theory of Atoms In Molecules) calculations for five biological systems with different levels of structural complexity. We have studied Acetylcholinesterase (AChE), D2 Dopamine Receptor (D2DR), beta Secretase (BACE1), Dihydrofolate Reductase (DHFR) and Sphingosine Kinase 1 (SphK1). In these molecular targets, we have analyzed different ligands with diverse structural characteristics. The inhibitory activities of most of them have been previously measured in our laboratory. Our results indicate that QTAIM calculations can be extremely useful for in silico studies. It is possible to obtain very accurate information about the strength of the molecular interactions that stabilize the formation of the different L-R complexes. Better correlations can be obtained between theoretical and experimental data by using QTAIM calculations, allowing us to discriminate among ligands with similar affinities. QTAIM analysis gives fairly…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a simulation / modelling, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free