Evidence Hub

From Quantum Mechanics to Coarse-Grained Models: Bridging the Gap toward Polymer Rational Design

A. Semmeq, Andoni Ugartemendia, A. Mossa, S. Coiai, G. Brancolini, Giacomo Prampolini

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

In the rational design of novel polymers, the role of simulation methods based on classical physics is often hindered by the limited accuracy and transferability of the available models, at both the full-atomistic (FA) and coarse-grained (CG) level. Here, we introduce a first-principles-based, fully modular computational protocol for the generation of accurate and consistent FA and CG force fields, tailored on a specific material, and requiring as the sole input the chemical formula of one repeating monomeric unit of the target polymer. The proposed workflow is aimed to connect, across multiple scales, Quantum Mechanical (QM) calculations, FA and CG quantum-mechanically derived force fields (QMD-FFs), and Molecular Dynamics (MD), integrating them into a single, consistent, and reproducible framework. The protocol is tested on poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), a well-known polymeric material, widely used in the packaging industry. MD simulations carried out with our FA and CG QMD-FFs are found to significantly outperform standard general-purpose models in predicting key properties such as density, glass transition temperature, as well as the intra- and supra-molecular structure. Such improvement is traced back to the accuracy of the parent QM description by controlling the adherence of the lower level models to the reference set, monitoring this flow of information at each step of the applied procedure. The performances obtained for PET confirm the reliability of a general…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a new method / technique, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free